Sunday, February 17, 2019
When I heard the Learnd Astronomer :: essays research papers
Upon rare occasion, my fledgling blood brother actually decided to pull his nose out of his funky video game, and join me upon reading this poem. Actually, I should say that I squeeze him to do this, because he needed to analyze a poem for his sustain English class, and the music coming from the television was beyond annoying. Anyway, my brothers reaction to the poem was something along the stresss of So this guy is basically verbalism that science, by measuring and investigating nature, somehow detracts from its beauty.Although my initial motivator was to bop him on the head, I restrained myself and calmly told him that he is an idiot. Where does Walt of necessity disagree with science? He doesnt. It is an assumption on my idiot brothers part that he is drawing a thick line betwixt mechanical theory and natural beauty. The narrator only expresses his abomination for the "professor" subject, as well as the lecture-room crowd, who is, perhaps, pretentious in his o wn right. He only dislikes the method with which Astronomy is presented. The poems stark contrast between the two attitudes unspoilt serves to present Walts opinion, which is that the subject CAN be more(prenominal) organic, and less robotic. By having the narrator veer towards one extreme everyplace another, Walt ingeniously shows the possibility of middle ground.I know that I just stated the Whitman and the narrative are the same but the fact that the condition and the narrator dont always have the same point of view doesnt needs imply that in this case, they have different points of view. Whitman was a follower of the amorous tradition by and large, his poems do reflect what he feels and believes. If he had cherished to, Im sure he could have distanced himself from his narrators point of view more explicitly since he didnt, I assume that it wasnt his intention to do so.Returning to the poem, notation the wonderful quality of the poetise itself. There is a common misconce ption that free verse implies a total disregard of form this is, of course, far from the truth. Read aloud, I appreciate the way in which Whitman has echoed his reaction to the lecture in the long, sanely droning lines that make no attempt to mirror the natural rhythms of speech, and the beat easing of strain when he leaves, allowing poetry to reassert itself.