Lenin State and Revolution Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Lenin State and Revolution - Essay Example tally to him (Lenin), although the previous transmutations have succeeded in ensuring the state forge have perfected, the black marketing class cannot sit down and expect the state machine to produce by itself. He clarifies that, the purpose of state and revolution is to exchange the violent and destructive revolution with very peaceful and coherent transition (Lenin 1941, p. 9). He was for the perspicacity that, the proletarian cannot achieve their requirement by dint of violent mode. His ideas were for the attainment and seizure of power without destruction of properties and the old state structures. Violence destroys the existing resources and work force therefore, conflict is tantamount to destruction of the already established properties which is very unethical. Lenin was not against the reformation merely his main concern in the state and revolution was to discourage those people who took the Marx idea for granted that the bourg eois (owners of factor of production) must be executed and destroyed together with their properties. According to him, the owners of the means of production argon not bad but what is uncouth is the system they (bourgeois) use to control the political and economic avenues (Kelvin 1995, p. 90)Lenin sight that, very few countries can survive after destroying the bourgeois state. He believed that, in as spacious as the proletarian revolution must do away with the old states, it should not destroy and supplant the state itself (Kelvin 1995, p. 90). ... According to him, the owners of the means of production are not bad but what is uncouth is the method they (bourgeois) use to control the political and economic avenues (Kelvin 1995, p. 90) Lenin observed that, very few countries can survive after destroying the bourgeois state. He believed that, in as long as the proletarian revolution must do away with the old states, it should not destroy and abolish the state itself (Kelvin 1995, p. 90). The state must remain and it should action for along period of time without being destroyed. The resources which control and run the state are properties of the bourgeois. This therefore means, destroying the owners of means of production properties is equal to destruction of the state. His stand on the protection of the state does not imply that Lenin was for the opinion of weakening the revolution powers. He insisted that, the revolution power must be strong and need to range their period of revolution. In as far as the reforms are relevant and important, Lenin insisted on not transforming running(a) class into military militias. The transformation of the working class into military militia is only relevant if the owners of means of production use their military power to deter the revolutionaries effort. Nevertheless, transforming the working class to militia should be the farthest option when all the others options have failed (Kelvin 1995, p. 98). Lucio (1989, p. 69) states that, Lenin was not for the opinion that the proletarian class has only the mandate to require but not to govern. Such kind of ideas is for those who do not believe in changes in governance. According to Lenin, the state and revolutions are built on the ground of the proletariats having the capacity of