Catharine Beecher and Charlotte Perkins Essay

In the article Catharine Beecher and Charlotte Perkins Gilman Architects of Female Power by write Valerie Gill, Ms. Gill attempts to bridge the gap in the midst of what appears to be both hefty women of their time with two totally different faiths of the Ameri bottom woman and the pillowcase of support they should lead. The author smears out the obvious differences of opinions in the writings of the two women, who are related by the way, and the different era in which they write. Catharine Beecher was the capital aunt of Charlotte Perkins Gilman and lived and wrote during a time when a woman working in any other keister besides the mob was not something that happened often. A womans job during this time was to raise children and understand the floor a warm, inviting space that had functionality that would allow for separate spheres for the men and women, allowing the men to give way a place to discuss outside ventures and women to have a place to deal with domestic matt ers.Charlotte Perkins Gilman on the other hand, lived during a period where productiveness was happening in factories all over the country. Her feminist attempt to undo her great aunts idea that women should be assigned to notwithstanding the home made it appear that the two women had absolutely nothing in common when it came to the ideas on how women should be earned socially. Gill points out how the two actually different opinions actually have many things in common. Both women see to it that the role of women is very important to the health of society, even though they disaccord on what their roles should be. By suggesting that each writer knows what is the best arrangement for women to get word shows another similarity between the two writers.As pointed out by Gill, Both writers conceptualize the identity of women in spatial as well up as socioeconomic terms, assuming that the fulfillment of their own sex can be quite literally mapped out. The author gain grounds a poin t that even though their opinions of what is ideal are very different, the idea that on that point is unitary way to necessitate women live a full life is exactly the same. Both women also had the common conclusion that the womans place, whether it is in the home working or in the factory working, would make a great impact on the society. Architectural ideas as to collapse society are another thing these two authors had in common, as pointed out by Gill in the article. The elder author Beecher would make drawings in her articles more or less staging the home and using dividers as a way to make more areas in the home, and Gilman,being concerned about the lives led by farmers wives, included drawings of a cultivation union shaped like a pie that had common areas to share, as to make life easier for them.Interesting enough, Gill included in her article a picture of a drawing done by Beecher, along with her infant Harriet Beecher Stowe, later in life of a block of houses with co mmon areas utilize to house the homeless, helpless, and vicious which very much resembled Gilmans block community idea where people shared common spaces and so that some women could recognise care of the children and household duties while others went out in the community to work. This is an tenuous example of Beecher thinking like Gilman in the mixing of public and secret space. It is my opinion that the aging Beecher was beginning to think out of the box.This article was insightful and gave a great example of how people with a difference of opinion can actually be thinking the same. If one just lease the two womens writings without an open mind, one would think they were only different and had totally different ideas. Valerie Gill allowed the reader of the article to view a situation such as this one in a different way and to keep an open mind and read between the lines of any writings. I would have liked to have seen her go on and discuss the idea that some women may belong at home and some may belong in the workforce. I believe that all woman has a different situation to consider and what is important to one woman may not be important to another.